Reaching for sunshine…
Is photography valued as an art form? I attended a workshop recently on the “Business of Art” at which the presenter indicated that photography comprises only ten percent of visual art purchased by collectors. Why is that?
Indeed, I was at an art gallery recently and casually chatting with a woman apparently had an appreciation for art. This was evident by her open conversation with her husband. When she commented on one of my photographs, I provided explanation which enticed her to inquire further. The woman indicated that she was a painter but was curious about the art of photography. I shared with her several of my photographs on the Flickr app on my phone. She showed appreciation and asked if she could paint several of the scenes I captured. Of course, I agreed to the plea.
A photograph is the capture of a moment in time that will never exist again. When a photographer captures that moment in a manner which appeals artistically to others, that is rare and should hold respect. This is not to say that those who paint, create sculptures, and those who create art using other media are any less talented. Instead, it is to equate the medium of photography at the same level of appreciation as other art forms.
I ponder the question from the woman at the gallery and her attitude that painting a scene captured by a photographer is acceptable. If the scene appealed to a collector, I wonder which would be considered for purchase, the photograph or a painting of that same scene. Perhaps I should learn to paint.
0.000000
0.000000